Jose Mourinho: Should football ban the Special One?

Jose Mourinho, heralded as “The Special One,” has long been a figure in football. His tactical brilliance, trophy-laden career, and prideful personality have made him a managerial icon. Yet, the events of April 2, 2025, during Fenerbahce’s 2-1 Turkish Cup quarter-final defeat to arch-rivals Galatasaray, have laid a dark shadow over his legacy. In a moment of uncontrolled anger, Mourinho appeared to grab Galatasaray manager Okan Buruk by the nose, sparking a small brawl that saw three players sent off and the Portuguese tactician red-carded as well. This violent display, coupled with his history of controversy, raises a pressing question: Should Mourinho be banned from football?

Mourinho’s pattern of provocation

Mourinho’s altercation is not the first time but the latest chapter in a career marked by physical or verbal altercation. From poking Tito Vilanova in the eye during a 2011 Spanish Super Cup clash as Real Madrid boss to his repeated clashes with referees and opponents, Mourinho has often crossed the line between passion and anger. In Turkey, his tenure at Fenerbahce has been a theater for drama. Earlier this season, he was slapped with a four-match ban (later reduced to two) and fined £35,194 by the Turkish Football Federation for accusing referees of bias and labeling Galatasaray’s bench as “jumping like monkeys”, a comment that prompted racism allegations and a lawsuit from the rival club.

To say it is not enough, the April 2 incident, however, escalates his transgressions into physical territory. Video evidence shows Mourinho lunging at Buruk post-match, with the Galatasaray boss falling to the ground clutching his face. Galatasaray’s vice-president, Metin Ozturk, condemned the act, asking, “Where else in the world can he do this?” Fenerbahce countered with their own lawsuit, claiming an “attack on Mourinho’s personal rights,” but the scene is damning. For a man who has managed elite clubs like Chelsea, Manchester United, Real Madrid, and Inter Milan, this descent into physical confrontation feels unbecoming for someone with such a remarkable football pedigree.

READ ALSO

Why Xavi Hernandez comment on bias in La Liga officiating is true

Opinion: Has VAR done more harm than good in football?

How Barcelona could lose points after Osasuna win

Why Mourinho should be banned

Football is no stranger to heated rivalries, but there’s a line between competitive banters and reckless aggression. Mourinho’s actions breach that line. Managers are role models, the architects of team culture and ambassadors of morality in football. When a figure of his prominence resorts to violence, it sends a dangerous message to players, aspiring coaches, and football enthusiasts. The Turkish Cup clash was already boiling with tension: three red cards in stoppage time attest to that but Mourinho’s post-match altercation turned a fierce derby into a disgraceful show.

A ban, potentially lengthy or even permanent, could serve as a deterrent. The Turkish Football Federation has precedent for harsh punishment, and with Mourinho’s suspension sheet growing, two bans this season alone, plus fines and lawsuits, a stronger and heavier punishment is warranted. UEFA and FIFA, too, should take note. His history of inflammatory behavior spans continents: a two-match ban (later lifted) for the Vilanova incident, a one-match suspension for referee criticism at Chelsea in 2015, and countless verbal spats.

At 62, Mourinho shows no signs of covering his emotions. A ban could force accountability where self-restraint has failed.Moreover, his antics overshadow the game itself. Victor Osimhen’s brace for Galatasaray and Fenerbahce’s spirited fightback were covered by Mourinho’s temperament. Football deserves better than to be a stage for one man’s ego.

The counterargument for Mourinho’s ban

However, Mourinho’s supporters will argue that his passion is his genius. His fiery nature has led to multiple triumphs; Porto’s 2004 Champions League win, Inter’s 2010 treble, Chelsea’s three Premier League titles. These advocates will point to Buruk’s reaction of the incident and suggest the Galatasaray boss simulated the fall in order to draw attention to his own side. Social media posts have questioned Buruk’s reaction, with some calling it film trick. Fenerbahce’s claim of provocation from the opposition bench could also make the narrative true.

A total ban or a longer one could risk suppressing the emotion that makes football compelling. Mourinho’s behaviours, while offensive, are part of his brand, whether you love him or hate him, he draws attention to football. His record of 26 major trophies speaks for itself, and at Fenerbahce, where he’s chasing a first league title since 2012, his competitive edge remains vital. A suspension might weaken a team already six points behind Galatasaray in the Super Lig, punishing players and fans for their manager’s errors.

Conclusion

Passion is not enough reason for violence. Mourinho’s achievements does not mean he can walk away from any moral offence, and his pattern of escalation from verbal abuse to physical acts, demands corrections. Football has evolved beyond the days when such behavior was shrugged off as “character.” Modern governance, with its emphasis on respect and integrity, must hold him to account.

A lifetime ban might seem too much, his contributions to the game are undeniable, but a significant suspension, let me say six months to a year, feels justified. It would sideline him for key matches, hit his reputation, and signal that no one is above the standards of football. Fenerbahce could adapt under an interim boss, and Mourinho might return as one forced to mend his ways, forced to channel his anger more constructively.