Why did CBN takeover Union Bank? Inside the $300 Million loan, forensic audit and shocking allegations
Union Bank
Fresh details have emerged on the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)’s intervention in Union Bank of Nigeria (UBN), with new reports linking the January 2024 takeover to alleged financial irregularities, governance failures, and controversial loan transactions that reportedly raised concerns over the lender’s solvency.
The renewed spotlight on the case follows separate reports by Vanguard and The Guardian detailing findings from a forensic audit that allegedly uncovered questionable financial engineering, foreign loan exposure, and withdrawals tied to disputed obligations. While the allegations have not been tested in court and the full forensic report has not been publicly released, the reports provide the clearest picture yet of why CBN stepped in to remove Union Bank’s former board and management.
Importantly, the apex bank has repeatedly assured customers and stakeholders that Union Bank remains operational, stable, and capable of meeting its obligations, even as regulatory and judicial processes continue.
Why Did CBN Take Over Union Bank? Key Reasons Behind the Intervention
According to the reports, the CBN dissolved Union Bank’s board and management in January 2024 as part of a regulatory intervention aimed at protecting financial stability and preventing potential systemic risks to Nigeria’s banking sector.
The reported reasons behind the takeover include:
- Alleged financial reporting manipulation
- Questions over the handling of an unhedged $300 million Afreximbank facility
- Claims of unorthodox financial engineering
- Alleged diversion of foreign loans into other transactions
- Concerns over foreign exchange risk exposure
- Alleged inappropriate withdrawals linked to disputed obligations
- Broader solvency concerns that reportedly threatened the bank’s survival
Although these claims have circulated in the media, it is important to note that the CBN has not publicly released the full forensic audit, and no criminal conviction has been announced in relation to the matter.
The $300 Million Afreximbank Loan at the Centre of the Union Bank Controversy
A major issue highlighted in both reports is a $300 million facility obtained from Afreximbank by Titan Trust Bank, the institution linked to Union Bank’s former owners and later merged with the lender.
According to the reported audit findings, the loan was allegedly:
- Unhedged against foreign exchange risks
- Moved onto Union Bank’s balance sheet without full disclosure
- Potentially used as part of the funding structure for the acquisition of Union Bank shares
If established, analysts say such a structure could mean that Union Bank’s own resources were indirectly exposed to finance the purchase of its shares, a development that raises serious concerns about corporate governance, disclosure standards, and regulatory compliance.
One report further claimed the transaction contributed to a revaluation loss of about N396 billion, with interest and fees exceeding N147 billion by Q3 2025, though these figures remain based on reported audit extracts and have not been independently confirmed in court.
Alleged Loan Diversions, Swap Transactions and Withdrawals
Beyond the Afreximbank exposure, the reports also allege that foreign loans sourced from offshore lenders were not used for their original purposes.
Instead, investigators reportedly found that some of the funds were diverted into:
- Swap transactions
- Other financial arrangements not fully disclosed to stakeholders
- Internal movements that may have increased the bank’s financial vulnerability
The forensic findings also reportedly flagged multiple withdrawals from depositors’ and lenders’ funds.
One report alleged that around $58 million was withdrawn to settle obligations tied to the disputed Afreximbank loan, while another claimed that total inappropriate withdrawals exceeded $100 million. These alleged transactions were said to have worsened the bank’s foreign currency liquidity position.
Again, these remain allegations reported from audit extracts, and no final judicial determination has been made publicly on them.
READ ALSO
Union Bank saga explained: Is your money safe? — here’s what to know
What CBN Has Said About Union Bank’s Current Status
Despite the controversy, the CBN has maintained a consistent public position: Union Bank is still operating normally.
Following a March 25, 2026 Federal High Court judgment in Lagos, the apex bank said it was reviewing the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the ruling but stressed that Union Bank’s status remains unchanged under intervention management.
The CBN stated that:
- Union Bank remains fully capable of meeting its obligations
- Depositors and customers should not panic
- The bank continues to operate under regulatory oversight
- The intervention is part of broader efforts to ensure the institution remains safe, sound, and stable
This reassurance is significant, especially as the CBN also noted that a limited number of institutions remain under regulatory and judicial processes, even as it confirmed the successful recapitalisation of 33 banks.
Has Union Bank Recovered Since the Takeover?
Reports indicate that Union Bank has shown signs of recovery since the intervention.
According to both publications:
- The lender has regained market share
- It has continued meeting maturing obligations
- It remains fully operational
- Analysts believe it could meet the N200 billion capital requirement required to retain its standalone national banking licence
This suggests that, despite the controversy surrounding its former management, the bank’s operational base has improved under new leadership and tighter regulatory supervision.
What This Means for Union Bank Customers and Nigeria’s Banking Sector
For customers, the key takeaway is that Union Bank is still open for business, and the CBN has publicly assured depositors that the lender can meet its obligations.
For the wider financial sector, the case underscores the importance of:
- Strong corporate governance
- Transparent disclosure of large foreign obligations
- Proper hedging of FX-denominated loans
- Early regulatory intervention where solvency risks emerge
- Protecting depositors from the fallout of boardroom decisions
The Union Bank episode may also become a major reference point in discussions around banking supervision, acquisition financing, and regulatory enforcement in Nigeria’s financial system.
FAQ
1. Why did CBN take over Union Bank?
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) intervened in Union Bank of Nigeria in January 2024 after concerns reportedly emerged over financial irregularities, governance failures, risky foreign loan exposure, and solvency threats. Media reports citing forensic audit extracts say the move was aimed at protecting the bank and preventing wider financial instability.
2. What happened to Union Bank in Nigeria?
Union Bank came under CBN intervention management after the apex bank dissolved its board and management. The decision followed reported concerns about controversial transactions, including the handling of foreign loans, balance sheet exposure, and alleged internal fund movements that could have weakened the bank.
3. Is Union Bank still under CBN intervention in 2026?
Yes. Based on the latest public statements referenced in the reports, Union Bank remains under CBN intervention management, and the bank’s status is said to be unchanged pending ongoing regulatory and judicial processes.
4. Is Union Bank still safe for customers?
According to the CBN, Union Bank remains fully operational and capable of meeting its obligations to customers, depositors, and stakeholders. The regulator has repeatedly urged the public not to panic, indicating that the bank is stable under oversight.
5. Can customers still withdraw money from Union Bank?
Yes. The CBN has stated that all banks under regulatory oversight remain operational, which means customers should continue to have access to normal banking services, including deposits, transfers, and withdrawals, unless the bank communicates otherwise.
6. What is the $300 million Afreximbank loan in the Union Bank case?
Reports say a $300 million facility from Afreximbank, allegedly obtained by Titan Trust Bank before its merger with Union Bank, is a central issue in the forensic audit. Investigators reportedly questioned whether the loan was unhedged, insufficiently disclosed, and transferred to Union Bank’s books in a way that increased risk.
7. Was Union Bank used to finance the purchase of its own shares?
According to reported audit findings, investigators alleged that funds linked to the $300 million loan formed part of a larger structure used to acquire Union Bank shares, while repayment obligations were effectively placed on the bank. If proven, this would raise serious regulatory and governance concerns. However, these claims remain allegations and have not been publicly tested in court.
8. Did Union Bank misuse depositors’ funds?
Some reports cite forensic audit extracts alleging inappropriate withdrawals tied to disputed foreign loan obligations, including claims that depositors’ or lenders’ funds were used. However, these are allegations, not final legal findings, and no criminal conviction has been publicly announced.
9. What did CBN say about Union Bank after the court ruling?
After a March 25, 2026 Federal High Court ruling in Lagos, the CBN said it was reviewing the Certified True Copy of the judgment but stressed that Union Bank’s status had not changed. The regulator reiterated that the lender remains stable and under supervision.
10. Has Union Bank recovered after the CBN takeover?
Reports suggest that Union Bank has made progress since the intervention. The lender is said to have regained market share, met maturing obligations, and continued operating normally. Analysts also believe it may be able to meet the N200 billion capital requirement for a standalone national banking licence.
11. What role did Titan Trust Bank play in the Union Bank takeover story?
Titan Trust Bank is linked to the controversy because reports say it was the vehicle tied to Union Bank’s former owners and later merged with Union Bank. The forensic audit reportedly examined the bank’s role in the $300 million Afreximbank loan, the acquisition structure, and the transfer of financial exposure to Union Bank.
12. Has CBN released the full forensic audit on Union Bank?
No. As of the information in the reports, the CBN has not publicly released the full forensic audit report. Most of the details in circulation come from media accounts citing sources familiar with the investigation or extracts from the reported audit.
13. Did the CBN say Union Bank will shut down?
No. In fact, the CBN has said the opposite. The regulator has repeatedly assured the public that Union Bank remains operational, stable, and able to meet its obligations.
14. What does the Union Bank case mean for Nigeria’s banking sector?
The Union Bank case highlights the importance of:
- Strong banking supervision
- Transparent corporate governance
- Proper disclosure of foreign obligations
- Careful management of FX risk
- Early intervention to protect depositors and financial stability
It may also influence future regulatory scrutiny of mergers, acquisitions, and foreign loan structures in Nigeria’s banking sector.
15. What should Union Bank customers do now?
For now, customers should:
- Continue using official Union Bank channels
- Follow verified updates from CBN and Union Bank
- Avoid panic withdrawals based on unverified social media claims
- Monitor any future regulatory announcements
At present, the CBN says Union Bank remains safe and fully operational.