Sean Charles Dunn: What is felony? How many years imprisonment if convicted? here’s what to know

 Sean Charles Dunn: What is felony? How many years imprisonment if convicted? here’s what to know

Sean Charles Dunn fired after sandwich assault on federal agent in DC. Credit: Getty

Sean Charles Dunn, 37, a former Department of Justice employee, is at the center of a high-profile federal case after allegedly assaulting a U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer by throwing a wrapped sandwich and shouting verbal insults in Washington, D.C. The incident, which occurred on Sunday, Aug. 10, has led to Dunn’s termination from the DOJ and a felony charge that could carry serious consequences if he is convicted.

What the Felony Charge Means

Dunn has been charged under 18 U.S.C. § 111, a federal statute that prohibits assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers or employees of the United States while they are performing their official duties. The law distinguishes between misdemeanor and felony assaults. Simple assaults are considered Class A misdemeanors, punishable by up to one year in prison. However, assaults that involve physical contact or intent to commit another felony are elevated to a felony, carrying penalties of up to eight years in federal prison.



READ ALSO

Who is Sean Charles Dunn? The DOJ employee arrested for throwing a sandwich at a Federal agent

Sean Charles Dunn: Will ex-DOJ employee be jailed for throwing sandwich at officers? All to know

In Dunn’s case, prosecutors allege that he not only shouted profanities but also physically struck the officer with a sandwich. This act is considered a forcible assault, placing him in the felony category. Court filings indicate that he pointed at the officer and shouted, “F— you! You f—ing fascists! Why are you here? I don’t want you in my city!” before throwing the sandwich. Dunn attempted to flee but was apprehended and admitted to the act while being processed by police.

Potential Consequences if Convicted

If Dunn is convicted of the felony charge under 18 U.S.C. § 111, he could face several severe consequences:



  • Imprisonment: Up to eight years in federal prison.

  • Fines: Significant monetary penalties, which vary depending on the judge’s discretion.

  • Permanent Criminal Record: A felony conviction would remain on Dunn’s record, affecting future employment, civil rights, and reputation.

  • Collateral Consequences: Conviction could impact his ability to hold government positions, obtain professional licenses, or travel internationally.

The U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Ferris Pirro, emphasized the seriousness of the offense, stating, “This alleged assault is no joke – it’s a serious crime, and those who think otherwise will learn just how gravely mistaken they are.” Attorney General Pam Bondi also highlighted the administration’s zero-tolerance stance toward assaults on federal personnel.



Broader Context

Dunn’s case unfolds against a backdrop of increased federal enforcement and public safety measures in Washington, D.C. Federal authorities have reiterated the importance of protecting law enforcement officers from verbal and physical attacks while carrying out their duties. Cases like this are taken seriously because they challenge the authority and safety of federal personnel, and prosecutions serve as a warning to the public about the legal consequences of such actions.



Related post