Mass failure? Students demand answers for JAMB results
The X post by Alex Onyia (@winexviv) on May 10, 2025, highlights Ofili Onyekachi Emmanuel’s significant JAMB results drop in the 2025 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) conducted by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) in Nigeria. Ofili, aspiring to study medicine, scored 314 in 2024 but only 167 in 2025, despite increased preparation. The post raises concerns about JAMB’s scoring system, mentioning 3,487 students with similar issues and calling for transparency, such as allowing students to see their mark-sheets.
Official reports confirm the 2025 JAMB results were released, with over 1.5 million of 1,955,069 candidates scoring below 200, aligning with the post’s claims. JAMB withheld 96 results due to infractions and has 39,834 results under review, which may include cases like Ofili’s. The registrar, Prof. Ishaq Oloyede, stated the results are consistent with 12-year trends, but public concerns persist due to historical controversies, such as the 2023 Mmesoma Ejikeme fake result case.
This situation could impact students’ admission prospects, especially for competitive courses like medicine. The post’s demand for mark-sheet access is reasonable, as JAMB allows reviews, but the process is often criticized for opacity. The controversy shows the need for JAMB to address inefficiencies and ensure fairness.
Public reactions to the JAMB results controversy
The 2025 JAMB results controversy is not the first as such situations have occurred multiple times in the past. However, critics including parents, candidates and education expert have taken to social media to comment on the aggravating situation, demanding proper action and show of responsibility. Critics have shared personal experiences of JAMB injustices, reinforcing allegations of systemic issues. For example, @Sire_Sammi recounts a 2011 case where JAMB withheld results for unproven malpractice, wasting a year. Others in offline discussions within their neighborhood have held a conspiracy theory that this could be a way for the government to make profit from citizens.
RELATED STORIES
JAMB champions: Meet UTME top scorers in the last 10 years and their success secrets
Should JAMB be removed? Critical look at Nigeria’s education crisis
JAMB: Common reasons students fail, get low marks in UTME
Verification through official reports
To verify the post’s claims, I reviewed multiple news articles and JAMB updates from May 2025, focusing on the 2025 UTME results: P.M. News Article (May 9, 2025): Reports that JAMB withheld 96 results due to examination infractions, down from 123 last year, with a total of 2,030,862 candidates registered and 1,957,000 verified to have sat the exam. It details: 39,834 results under scrutiny. 1,426 cases under investigation. 2,157 fingerprint rejections due to registration infractions. 244 candidates caught with WhatsApp runs for leaked questions. 3,656 results withheld for extraneous fingerprints. 41,027 underage candidates registered, with 467 qualifying and 1 disqualified for malpractice. 501 candidates with disabilities examined, with one involved in impersonation. Four CBT centers delisted for technical deficiencies, and 80 suspects interrogated for malpractices.
This article supports the post’s claim of systemic issues, with 39,834 results under review potentially including the 3,487 students mentioned. Punch Article (May 8, 2025): States that out of 1.9 million candidates, approximately 1.5 million scored below 200, consistent with 12-year trends. It notes delays in individual results due to reviews for borderline cases, expected to be resolved by the following day from the interview date (Wednesday in Abuja). This aligns with the post’s mention of over 1.5 million scoring below 200. NAN Article (May 5, 2025): Confirms the statistical analysis, with 1,955,069 candidates sitting, 1,534,654 scoring below 200, 420,415 above 200, and only 756 above 320, with 7,658 scoring between 300-319. It also notes 40,247 underage candidates, with 467 meeting exceptional ability thresholds.
These sources collectively verify the post’s claims about low scores and ongoing reviews, though the exact number of 3,487 concerned students is not officially confirmed, it likely falls within the 39,834 under scrutiny.
JAMB’s response and transparency
JAMB has stated its commitment to eliminating malpractice and ensuring result integrity, with processes for post-examination analysis, including identity verification and biometric checks. However, the post’s call for mark-sheet access is critical, as students have the right to verify scores, especially given the CBT format’s potential for errors. JAMB allows result reviews, but the process is often slow, contributing to distrust.
Statistical breakdown of JAMB’s claim
To organize the data, here is a table summarizing key statistics from the 2025 UTME:
This table illustrates the scale of issues, with a significant portion of results under review and many candidates affected by scoring below admission thresholds.
Conclusion
The X post’s concerns about Ofili’s score drop and JAMB’s inefficiencies are substantiated by official data showing 39,834 results under scrutiny and a high percentage of low scores. The call for transparency, such as mark-sheet access, is justified given past controversies and current challenges. JAMB must address these issues to restore trust and ensure fair opportunities for students like Ofili, whose academic dreams are at stake.
