Ethereum Foundation overhauls grant program — New ‘Wishlist’ model sparks debate on innovation and fairness

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has taken a bold new step in reshaping how it funds ecosystem growth. On November 3, 2025, the Foundation’s Ecosystem Support Program (ESP) announced a revamped grant model designed to make funding more strategic and impact-driven. The new structure introduces two main funding channels — Wishlists and Requests for Proposals (RFPs) — both intended to focus on pressing needs within the Ethereum ecosystem.

The shift comes after EF paused its open grant applications earlier this year, citing an overwhelming number of submissions that stretched its small team. The organization now aims to take a proactive rather than reactive approach, working closely with other EF teams to identify high-impact areas before distributing resources.

The Wishlist and RFP Model Explained

Under the new framework, Wishlists represent broad goals that define priority areas such as cryptography, privacy, security, and community growth. These wishlists encourage developers and innovators to propose projects that address key gaps without prescribing a specific method or outcome — giving builders some flexibility to experiment.

In contrast, RFPs (Requests for Proposals) outline clearly defined problems and expected deliverables, with specific timelines, requirements, and performance measures. This approach ensures that funding is allocated to solutions that can produce measurable, ecosystem-wide benefits.

Essentially, the new structure moves EF’s grants from being open-ended and exploratory to being more targeted, efficient, and goal-oriented. But while this sounds like progress, it’s also stirring debate within the developer community.

Concerns About Inclusion and Innovation

Many developers worry that the new system could favor established teams and shut out fresh innovators. Previously, anyone with a strong idea could pitch directly to the Foundation. Now, with the focus on predefined goals and RFPs, some fear that new and unconventional projects might not fit neatly into EF’s framework.

For smaller startups — particularly those working on emerging niches like crypto payroll, decentralized finance tools, and DAO-based systems — this might create barriers. If a project doesn’t align with an active Wishlist or RFP, it could struggle to secure funding, potentially narrowing the diversity of innovation across the Ethereum ecosystem.

Opportunities Still Exist — If Startups Adapt

Despite concerns, there are opportunities for new builders to thrive within this new model. Startups can boost their chances by aligning proposals with active Wishlist themes or RFP goals. They can also participate in ESP Office Hours, where Foundation advisors help applicants fine-tune their pitches and ensure their work matches ongoing priorities.

Smaller developers are also encouraged to explore alternative funding streams, such as cross-chain grants, DAO-based community funding, and private partnerships. Building strong ties within the Ethereum community — through collaborations and open-source contributions — could further enhance visibility and attract indirect support.

The Bigger Picture: A More Organized Ethereum Future

The Ethereum Foundation insists the change isn’t about gatekeeping — it’s about strategy. By aligning grantmaking with measurable impact and coordination across EF teams, the Foundation hopes to ensure that every dollar drives meaningful progress.

Still, the coming months will be crucial. If executed thoughtfully, the Wishlist and RFP model could create a more responsive and sustainable funding ecosystem. If not, it risks concentrating resources among the already established, sidelining the next wave of innovators who could redefine blockchain’s future.

For now, the community watches — hopeful, cautious, and eager to see whether Ethereum’s latest experiment in governance will set a new standard for decentralized funding.

FAQ

Q1: What is the Ethereum Foundation’s new grant model?
The new model introduces two funding paths — Wishlists (broad goals) and RFPs (defined project calls) — to better align grants with the ecosystem’s needs.

Q2: Why did the Ethereum Foundation change its funding structure?
EF said its open application process became overwhelming, limiting its ability to act strategically. The new model helps streamline funding and ensure impact-driven results.

Q3: How can small developers apply for grants now?
They can review current Wishlist and RFP listings on EF’s website, align their proposals accordingly, and attend Office Hours for personalized guidance.

Q4: Which areas are currently prioritized for funding?
The initial Wishlists and RFPs cover cryptography, privacy, the application layer, community growth, and security.

Q5: Will this model affect innovation in the crypto space?
It could, depending on implementation. While the model promotes focus, some fear it may limit support for unconventional or early-stage projects.