Andrew Chauke suspended: What you need to know about the prosecuting head’s fall

President Cyril Ramaphosa has officially suspended Andrew Chauke, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) in South Gauteng, amid allegations of misconduct tied to state capture. The announcement has sparked national interest, marking a major shift in efforts to restore integrity within South Africa’s prosecuting authority.

Presidential Action: Suspension Confirmed

On Monday, 21 July 2025, the Presidency confirmed the suspension of Advocate Andrew Chauke following recommendations from Justice Minister Ronald Lamola. Chauke’s suspension follows claims that he failed to act decisively on serious corruption allegations involving politically exposed persons during his tenure. The move is widely viewed as a response to growing calls for accountability in the wake of the Zondo Commission findings.

State Capture Allegations Surface

Andrew Chauke has been named in recent reports as one of the senior officials who allegedly enabled elements of state capture by not pursuing high-level cases. Chauke failed to prosecute multiple cases flagged by investigative bodies, allowing key suspects to evade justice. His perceived inaction during critical years has raised questions about the National Prosecuting Authority’s (NPA) role during the height of political corruption.

Presidency Moves with Unusual Speed

The decision to suspend Chauke was taken swiftly, a rarity in matters involving senior judicial figures. Ramaphosa’s prompt response reflects his administration’s increasing sensitivity to public pressure regarding anti-corruption enforcement. Chauke was informed of the allegations and given an opportunity to respond, but the seriousness of the claims warranted immediate intervention.

A Legacy in Jeopardy

Chauke, who served as the South Gauteng DPP since 2010, once held a reputation for being a steadfast prosecutor. However, his tenure has come under growing scrutiny in recent years, especially regarding high-profile cases that stalled or never saw courtrooms. His suspension places a shadow over his legacy and may potentially open the door to internal investigations into other unresolved matters.

READ ALSO

Buti Manamela appointed as new Minister of Higher Education – what you need to know

Fikile Mbalula endorses Cachalia amid SAPS reshuffle

What Happens Next?

The Presidency has confirmed that a formal inquiry will determine whether Chauke should be permanently removed. In the interim, an acting DPP will be appointed to ensure continuity within the South Gauteng office. The inquiry will also allow Chauke to make representations to defend his conduct, though political and legal commentators suggest the evidence already made public could prove damaging.

Public Reaction and Broader Implications

Civil society groups and anti-corruption watchdogs have welcomed the suspension. Many see it as a long-overdue step in restoring credibility to the NPA, an institution often accused of selective prosecution. The action against Chauke may also signal a turning point in Ramaphosa’s promise to hold those implicated in state capture accountable, regardless of their rank.

A Critical Moment for Judicial Reform

Andrew Chauke’s suspension is not just about one individual, it reflects the growing momentum behind South Africa’s efforts to rebuild trust in its democratic institutions. As the inquiry unfolds, all eyes will remain on the NPA and the Presidency’s willingness to maintain transparency and act decisively.