Ghana saga: Is it time for MultiChoice to rethink Pay-TV model?
DStv introduces Arcade: Free mini-games now live in the MyDStv app to reward and engage users
The recent standoff between Ghana’s Ministry of Communications and MultiChoice-owned DStv Ghana has once again cast a harsh spotlight on the Pay-TV giant’s business model across Africa. With mounting criticisms over pricing, regulatory pushbacks, and subscriber dissatisfaction, observers are beginning to ask a bold but necessary question: is it time for MultiChoice to rethink, or even completely divorce, its traditional Pay-TV model?
Mounting Pressure in Ghana
MultiChoice Ghana’s decision to increase subscription fees by 15% earlier this year came at a time when Ghana’s economic indicators were relatively stable. The cedi had appreciated by approximately 10% against major foreign currencies, inflation was falling, and fuel prices had dipped. This context made the hike not only poorly timed but also deeply unpopular. The backlash reached its peak when Ghana’s Minister for Communications and Digitalisation, Ursula Owusu-Ekuful, intervened, citing the price hike as unjustified and unfair to Ghanaians.
READ ALSO
MultiChoice vs Ghana: What ongoing faceoff means for DStv subscribers
MultiChoice rejects 30% DStv fee reduction proposal… what this means for subscribers
The Minister revealed that DStv Ghana had proposed to maintain the current high pricing structure while halting revenue remittances to its headquarters—an offer she flatly rejected, describing it as lacking logic and failing to address the core issue of affordability for consumers. The Minister’s tough stance signals a growing intolerance for corporate behaviour perceived to exploit local markets and ride on weak regulatory enforcement.
Echoes of Nigeria’s Experience
This isn’t the first time MultiChoice has been embroiled in a regulatory faceoff in West Africa. In Nigeria, the Pay-TV provider was taken to court by the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (CCPT) over arbitrary price increases. The Nigerian House of Representatives even called for a suspension of DStv’s pricing adjustments. Eventually, MultiChoice bowed to the pressure and reversed the increase—a rare capitulation that emboldened other stakeholders across the continent to demand fairer treatment.
In both cases, the central complaint is the same: MultiChoice seems to wield its market dominance with little regard for economic realities or local sentiments. While the company has long argued that pricing adjustments are driven by operational costs and exchange rate volatility, many believe these justifications no longer hold water in an era where digital innovation can offer better, more affordable alternatives.
A Crumbling Business Model?
Beyond regional regulatory battles, MultiChoice faces a far more existential threat: the declining relevance of Pay-TV. As Techpoint Africa recently analysed in an insightful piece, Pay-TV as we know it is gradually becoming obsolete. The subscription model, bundling channels irrespective of viewer preference, is losing out to on-demand, digital-first platforms like Netflix, Showmax, and YouTube, where users pay only for what they watch—or even enjoy content for free.
Young, tech-savvy Africans are increasingly rejecting rigid channel bouquets and instead streaming football matches, series, and even live news via smartphones and smart TVs. Unlike Pay-TV, these platforms offer flexibility, user control, and often better pricing. Moreover, the expansion of 4G and broadband infrastructure across Africa makes internet-based content more accessible than ever before.
MultiChoice has responded by pushing its streaming platform Showmax, but the transition has been rocky. Showmax is not yet as widely adopted as its global competitors, partly due to its limited content variety and occasional user interface issues. However, its recent revamp and partnerships with international studios suggest that MultiChoice is at least aware of the urgency.
A Crossroads: Reinvention or Resistance?
With Ghana’s regulatory clampdown and Nigeria’s legal precedents, MultiChoice now stands at a strategic crossroads. It can either double down on its legacy Pay-TV model and risk further alienating both regulators and consumers, or pivot aggressively into digital, user-driven entertainment that aligns with Africa’s rapidly evolving media consumption habits.
This transition would require more than a technical shift—it would demand a complete overhaul of how MultiChoice thinks about pricing, access, and customer engagement. It must recognise that the future lies in content freedom, platform agnosticism, and user empowerment. It must unbundle its content, localise pricing strategies, and collaborate with regulators rather than resisting them.
The Consumer Advantage
If there’s a silver lining to the ongoing confrontations, it’s that African consumers stand to benefit in the long run. Regulatory pushback, when guided by public interest, has the potential to correct market imbalances and foster fairer pricing. As seen in Nigeria and now Ghana, authorities are waking up to the need to protect their citizens from unchecked corporate practices. This could eventually force companies like MultiChoice to become more responsive, competitive, and innovative.
Subscribers will likely enjoy more flexible packages, lower prices, and better service quality if Pay-TV monopolies are broken or forced to adapt. Already, free-to-air satellite alternatives and IPTV platforms are gaining traction in many urban areas, offering viable substitutes to DStv. Consumers, now armed with choices, are gradually becoming the ultimate power brokers in the entertainment ecosystem.
Conclusion: Time to Break the Mold?
For decades, MultiChoice has held sway as the kingpin of African Pay-TV. But in 2025, it finds itself besieged on all fronts—from regulators, digital disruptors, and its own customers. The battle in Ghana, like that in Nigeria, may just be the tipping point. If MultiChoice fails to radically innovate and embrace a digital-first, user-friendly future, it may soon find itself outpaced and out of touch.
Divorcing the Pay-TV model doesn’t mean abandoning legacy—it means reimagining it. The future of entertainment in Africa is leaner, smarter, and more democratic. Whether MultiChoice will lead that future—or be left behind—is a question only bold action can answer.
